« BackSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Article in Press

Global Trend of Survival and Damage of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Observational Studies from the 1950s to 2000s

  • Anselm Mak, MBBS, MRCP, MMedSc, FRCP

      Affiliations

    • Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Anselm Mak, MBBS, MMedSc, FRCP, Assistant Professor and Consultant, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Level 10, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore 119228
  • ,
  • Mike W.-L. Cheung, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Hui Jin Chiew, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Yang Liu, BM, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Roger Chun-man Ho, MBBS, MMed, MRCPsych

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychological Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University of Singapore, Singapore

published online 18 January 2012.
Corrected Proof

Objective

To assess systemically with meta-analysis the trend of survival and its determinants, which are hindering further improvement of survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over the past 5 decades.

Methods

Retrospective, cross-sectional, and prospective observational studies addressing survival and damage in SLE patients published between 1 January 1950 and 31 July 2010 were identified in electronic databases. Using the random-effects model, effect size was calculated based on the logit of the overall 5- and 10-year survival rates. The pooled logit and its robust 95% confidence interval were transformed back into the 5- and 10-year survival rates, after adjusting for potential dependence on the data. Potential factors predicting the pooled survival rates were explored by meta-regression.

Results

Seventy-seven studies involving 18,998 SLE patients were analyzed. Between the 1950s and the 2000s, their overall survival significantly increased, from 74.8% to 94.8% and 63.2% to 91.4% for the overall 5-year and 10-year survival, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival improvement, however, appeared to slow down between 1980 and 1990. Meta-regression revealed that neuropsychiatric and renal damage negatively affected the overall 5-year survival, whereas neuropsychiatric damage remained so for the 10-year survival for the past 50 years. Furthermore, the prevalence of neuropsychiatric damage has been significantly increasing over the past 5 decades.

Conclusions

For the past 50 years, damage involving the renal and neuropsychiatric systems has been negatively affecting survival of SLE patients. Early detection and aggressive management of renal and neuropsychiatric involvement may potentially improve further the survival of lupus patients.

Keywords:  SLE , lupus , survival , damage , meta-analysis , neuropsychiatric , renal

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

PII: S0049-0172(11)00346-5

doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.11.002

« BackSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism