Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial—subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided (USG) versus blind (landmark-guided, LMG) corticosteroid subacromial–subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain.

Methods

The searches were performed on PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid CochraneCENTRAL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus from database inception through March 27, 2015. Studies were included trials comparing USG versus LSG injections for the treatment of adults with subacromial–subdeltoid bursitis. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and appraisal of the studies. The outcome measures collected were the decreased VAS and SDQ scores, the increased shoulder function scores and shoulder abduction motion range, and the effective rate at 6 weeks after injection.

Results

Seven papers including 445 patients were reviewed; 224 received LMG injections and 221 received USG injections. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of USG for pain score [MD = 1.19, 95% CI (0.39, 1.98), P = 0.003] and SDQ score [MD = 5.01, 95% CI (1.82, 8.19), P = 0.02] at 6 weeks after injection. Also there was a statistically significant difference between the groups, with greater improvement reported of shoulder function scores [SMD = 0.89, 95% CI (0.56, 1.23), P < 0.001] and shoulder abduction motion range [MD 32.69, 95% CI (14.82, 50.56), P < 0.001] in the USG group. More effective rate was also reported with USG group and the difference was statistically significant [risk ratio = 1.6, 95% CI (1.02, 2.50), P = 0.04].

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections potentially offer a significantly greater clinical improvement over blind SASD bursitis injections in adults with shoulder pain.

Section snippets

Methods

This systematic review of randomized controlled trials was performed according to the current recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration [11] and reported using the criteria of the PRISMA statement [12].

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the generic inverse variance method (Rev Man 5.3, The Cochrane Library). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and the chi-square-based test. The decreased VAS and SDQ scores, increased shoulder function scores, and shoulder abduction motion range at 6 weeks after injection between USG and LMG groups were expressed in terms of the weighted mean difference or standard mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI) evaluation. For

Results

We identified 305 articles; seven RCTs were eligible for this review (Fig. 1), with a total of 445 adult patients [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Characteristics of the enrolled studies are described in Table 1.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in the clinical and functional outcomes of USG versus LMG SASD bursa injections in adults with shoulder pain based on the current evidence base. A total of eight RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that USG SASD injections were more efficient than the LMG injections. USG injections significantly decreased the VAS and SDQ scores, and increased shoulder function and shoulder abduction motion range at 6

Conclusions

The meta-analysis in this study provides evidence that ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections potentially offer a significantly greater clinical improvement over blind SASD injections in adults with shoulder pain. Therefore, we believe that the US-guided SASD injection technique can be a useful treatment that leads to improvements in patients with SASD bursitis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors who shared individual patient data. No funding was received for this study.

References (24)

  • E. Soh et al.

    Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord

    (2011)
  • K.T. Amber et al.

    Comparing the accuracy of ultrasound versus fluoroscopy in glenohumeral injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J Clin Ultrasound

    (2014)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Peripheral Joint Injections

      2022, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
    • Ultrasound Guidance Is Not Superior in Subacromial Bursa and Intraarticular Injections but Superior in Bicipital Groove: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      2022, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ideal shoulder injection can provide patients with both relief and clarity about the cause of the pain. In the present study, the preliminary analysis suggested no statistically significant difference (MD 0.41 [−0.02, 0.44]; I2 = 74%; P = .06) in the VAS score, a finding supported by that in Ayekoloye et al.37 Four studies showed that the USG group had a significantly greater pain relief because of the limited number of literature included in previous studies.12,38-40 To further explore the heterogeneity, 2 subgroup analyses were performed in the present study.

    • The Shoulder and Elbow: Pain Medicine: A Case-Based Learning Series

      2021, The Shoulder and Elbow: Pain Medicine: A Case-Based Learning Series
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text